What’s It All Mean?

So my wife and I went to see PROMETHEUS because I felt it was a movie that should be experienced in a theater with a big screen in 3D and surround sound to get the full effect. Since we can’t stand distractions, which are impossible to avoid if you go to a multiplex these days — rude movie-goers, crying babies, super-loud previews, etc. — it takes something special to get us into the theater, instead of waiting for new releases on Netflix.

For me, that “something” is it must be big on a visual level. But it also has to appeal to my desire for meaning and substance. I don’t care if all the plot points don’t make sense, or if the story is lacking in characterization. If it makes you think, if it makes you feel awe, wonder, fear, sadness, that’s what matters. Yet more often than not, whether it’s a big event film or small indie I’ve watched at home, I’m left shrugging my shoulders, thinking: Eh, it was okay. Nothing special.

To wit, PROMETHEUS and at the other end of the spectrum, JEFF, WHO LIVES AT HOME. You may be wondering what the two have in common. The short answer is they are both about the meaning of life… or more precisely, the meaning of life as seen in movies. That’s why I was looking forward to seeing PROMETHEUS so much. The trailers, the bits of plot info that were leaked had me anticipating a Big Idea story about who created life on earth, and perhaps, why. Since I am an agnostic, I hoped it would provide a plausible explanation for all the various creation myths that seem to implicate aliens as the inspiration for depictions of supreme beings with god-like powers.

I also was intrigued by the trailer about David, the android created for the mission. What I loved about ALIEN and ALIENS was how the android characters in both were ambiguous in their intent, raising all kinds of questions about morality and what it means to be human. The best representation of the robot-as-sentient-being conundrum, in my opinion, is another Ridley Scott classic: BLADE RUNNER. When I watched the David trailer in which he states he isn’t capable of emotion, while shedding artificial tears, you have to question why he even has that capability. Why would he be programmed to simulate “fake” feelings such as curiosity or a fascination with Peter O’Toole in the epic movie, LAWRENCE OF ARABIA?

And then we see a close-up of David’s fingerprint, showing a “W” pattern which is the Weyland Industries logo. It reminded me of the saying that God is hidden in the details — or is it the Devil? — which stoked my anticipation even higher for the movie. Here’s the short video, which I think is more interesting than anything in PROMETHEUS:

http://www.weylandindustries.com/david

I’m not going to get into a blow-by-blow review of the movie or why it was such a letdown. The bottom line was it raised plenty of profound questions… but didn’t actually attempt to answer those questions in any real coherent fashion. It was just so vague and devoid of any serious intellectual discussion or debate on what the Ultimate Discovery truly represented (or didn’t). Sure, there were plenty of “faith” references and metaphors sprinkled about, but heck, you can find more interesting theological theories on those History Channel shows about “Ancient Aliens” supposedly being the source of Man’s god myths. Why did God or Alien Engineers make us? In PROMETHEUS, the closest thing we get to a theory is “because they can.” It’s the same rationale offered for why androids like David are created — because Weyland can do it.

Except that’s not true. David was created with very specific functions and purposes in mind as you can see in the trailer. So why were the humans created by the Engineers — or God, for that matter? What purpose or function were we meant to perform? Maybe the trick is to reverse engineer the question: why did Man create the concept of God? If we have no true purpose for being, no “soul” to save, would we simply be amoral creatures like the Alien, or robotic androids like David?

In JEFF, WHO LIVES AT HOME, at least there is a theory offered: everything is connected and if we look for the signs, we will find the ultimate meaning for why we are here — we will discover our fate as it was meant to be, in relation to other people. At no point is God brought into the picture, but Jeff is the only one who seems to have “faith” in his life having a bigger purpose… even though by all appearances, he is a loser. Jeff himself says he isn’t really happy with his life. Then through a series of “coincidences” involving his not-so-close brother and their widowed mother, a bunch of things happen that ultimately tie in together at the end, proving Jeff’s theory about the meaning of life. It isn’t really very convincing though, and for me, it was another overrated Duplass Brothers little slice of life movie that doesn’t actually amount to much. It wasn’t bad, and I chuckled during parts of it. But I wouldn’t pay to go see a movie like this in the theater.

The only thing it made me wonder about is who does pay to go see films like this, and why? At least with PROMETHEUS, my wife and I had something to talk about as we left the theater — mainly, what the heck was the black ooze stuff and who created it? Or was the black ooze, in fact, God? Beats me!

Advertisements
Explore posts in the same categories: movies, movies that suck

Tags: , , , , ,

Both comments and pings are currently closed.


%d bloggers like this: